Published in

Nature Research, Scientific Reports, 1(10), 2020

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65043-8

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

RISK6, a 6-gene transcriptomic signature of TB disease risk, diagnosis and treatment response

Journal article published in 2020 by Adam Penn-Nicholson ORCID, Stanley Kimbung Mbandi, Ethan Thompson, Simon C. Mendelsohn, Sara Suliman, Novel N. Chegou, Stephanus T. Malherbe, Fatoumatta Darboe, Mzwandile Erasmus, Willem A. Hanekom, Nicole Bilek, Michelle Fisher, Stefan H. E. Kaufmann, Jill Winter, Melissa Murphy and other authors.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractImproved tuberculosis diagnostics and tools for monitoring treatment response are urgently needed. We developed a robust and simple, PCR-based host-blood transcriptomic signature, RISK6, for multiple applications: identifying individuals at risk of incident disease, as a screening test for subclinical or clinical tuberculosis, and for monitoring tuberculosis treatment. RISK6 utility was validated by blind prediction using quantitative real-time (qRT) PCR in seven independent cohorts. Prognostic performance significantly exceeded that of previous signatures discovered in the same cohort. Performance for diagnosing subclinical and clinical disease in HIV-uninfected and HIV-infected persons, assessed by area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, exceeded 85%. As a screening test for tuberculosis, the sensitivity at 90% specificity met or approached the benchmarks set out in World Health Organization target product profiles for non-sputum-based tests. RISK6 scores correlated with lung immunopathology activity, measured by positron emission tomography, and tracked treatment response, demonstrating utility as treatment response biomarker, while predicting treatment failure prior to treatment initiation. Performance of the test in capillary blood samples collected by finger-prick was noninferior to venous blood collected in PAXgene tubes. These results support incorporation of RISK6 into rapid, capillary blood-based point-of-care PCR devices for prospective assessment in field studies.