Published in

Oxford University Press, Rheumatology, Supplement_1(60), 2021

DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab247.008

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

P009 Service evaluation to optimise ophthalmological services for hydroxychloroquine retinal screening

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Background/Aims Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), a frequently-used therapy in rheumatology, can be associated with retinal toxicity. More stringent screening and monitoring guidelines for HCQ-related retinopathy were published by the Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCOphth) in 2018. Recommendations include: 1) baseline retinal screening within six-twelve months of commencing HCQ; 2) subsequent annual monitoring for at-risk patients, specifically: concurrent tamoxifen-use, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60ml/min/1.73m2, HCQ dose >5mg/kg/day; 3) annual monitoring for all other patients after five years continuous treatment; 4) patient education on HCQ retinopathy. We quantified the rheumatology HCQ exposure and estimated burden on ophthalmology, to inform the development of HCQ retinal screening services. Methods Cross-sectional data were extracted for patients established on HCQ between 1995-2020 including: weight; eGFR; concomitant retino-toxic medication; concomitant retinal pathology; HCQ dose and duration; documentation of patient education on retinal side-effects. Documentation of relevant ophthalmic testing at baseline (i.e. at time of starting HCQ) were recorded, specifically colour fundus photography, spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and 10-2 Humphrey visual field (HVF) testing as necessary. Subsequent monitoring with 10-2 HVFs, SD-OCT, autofluorescence (AF) and electrodiagnostic tests (EDTs) as appropriate annually from baseline and from 5 years was recorded. Results 150 patients were included, 84% female, with a mean baseline age of 50.7 years (SD 14.8) and mean weight of 76.4kg (SD 17.6). 63% were on HCQ >5 years (mean duration 7.0 years, SD 5.1). At time of auditing, 50% (75/150) patients had permanently ceased HCQ (62% due to treatment >5 years). 60% patients had documented evidence of education regarding HCQ retinopathy. Of the 150 patients, 39% had baseline risks for retinopathy. 6% had a baseline eGFR <60ml/min/1.73m2. 32% were commenced on HCQ dose greater than 5mg/kg/day. No patients were on concomitant tamoxifen; one patient was on a known retino-toxic drug (quinine). 4% of patients had pre-existing retinal pathology. Of the 75 patients still taking HCQ at time of auditing, 27 (36%) had baseline risk factors warranting yearly retinal screening and 44 (58%) had been on treatment >5years. Most ophthalmology reviews were put on hold until a screening service was established. Of the small number (5.3%) that had baseline ophthalmic screening, 12.5% had colour photography and 75% had SD-OCT. No patients required HVF testing or EDTs. Annual screening revealed 50% of patients had 10-2 HVFs; 75% had SD-OCT; 75% had AF. Only one patient developed maculopathy, not attributed to HCQ. Conclusion Our results demonstrate the need for service development to facilitate adherence to RCOphth guidance. Up to 40% of patients started on HCQ have baseline risks for retinopathy, most due to dosing >5mg/kg/day warranting yearly screening. Our findings will inform development of a rheumatology HCQ retinal screening pathway and services, to ensure safe long-term use of HCQ. Disclosure C. Lee*: None. M. Dey*: None. M. Hng: None. S. Peterson: None. I. Rahiman: None. M. Elshafei: None. C. Estrach: None. N.J. Goodson: None.