Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Oxford University Press, European Heart Journal, Supplement_1(42), 2021

DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.1187

Elsevier, Resuscitation, (164), p. 93-100, 2021

DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.04.020

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The effect of immediate coronary angiography after cardiac arrest without ST-segment elevation on left ventricular function. A sub-study of the COACT randomised trial

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Background The effect of immediate coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients who are successfully resuscitated after cardiac arrest in the absence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) on left ventricular function is currently unknown. Purpose To evaluate whether immediate coronary angiography and PCI improves left ventricular function in patients who are successfully resuscitated from cardiac arrest without STEMI. Methods This prespecified sub-study of the multicentre COACT trial evaluated 552 patients, successfully resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without signs of STEMI. Patients were randomized to either undergo immediate coronary angiography or delayed coronary angiography, after neurologic recovery. All patients underwent PCI if indicated. The main outcomes of this analysis were left ventricular ejection fraction and end-diastolic and systolic volumes assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging or echocardiography. Results Data on left ventricular function was available for 397 patients. The mean (± standard deviation) left ventricular ejection fraction was 45.2% (±12.8) in the immediate angiography group and 48.4% (±13.2) in the delayed angiography group (mean difference: −3.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], −6.75 to 0.37). Median left ventricular end-diastolic volume was 177 ml in the immediate angiography group compared to 169 ml in the delayed angiography group (ratio of geometric means: 1.06; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.19). In addition, mean left ventricular end-systolic volume was 90 ml in the immediate angiography group compared to 78 ml in the delayed angiography group (ratio of geometric means: 1.13; 95% CI 0.97 to 1.32). Conclusion In patients successfully resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and without signs of STEMI, immediate coronary angiography was not found to improve left ventricular dimensions or function compared with a delayed angiography strategy. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Netherlands Heart InstituteBiotronikAstraZeneca