Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

SAGE Publications, Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers, 1(28), p. 97-112, 2012

DOI: 10.1177/0883911512467643

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Studies on the biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Bacterial cellulose was functionalized with a chimeric protein containing a cellulose-binding module and the adhesion peptide Arg-Gly-Asp. Small-diameter bacterial cellulose membranes were produced and subcutaneously implanted in sheep for 1–32 weeks. The implants triggered a biological response similar to other high surface-to-volume implants. There were no significant differences in the inflammation degree between the bacterial cellulose coated with the recombinant protein Arg-Gly-Asp–cellulose-binding module and the native bacterial cellulose. The implants were considered to be mildly irritating to the tissue compared to the negative control sample (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene). The analysis of the fluorescence microscopy revealed that, apart from increasing cell adhesion, the presence of Arg-Gly-Asp stimulated an even cell distribution, while the cells on the untreated bacterial cellulose seemed to form aggregates. Furthermore, the cells on the Arg-Gly-Asp–treated bacterial cellulose presented a more elongated morphology. Mechanical tests indicated that the small-diameter bacterial cellulose tubes were more elastic than the human arteries and veins.