Published in

SAGE Publications, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 4(31), p. 649-666, 2013

DOI: 10.1068/c1274

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Pork-Barrel versus Irrelevance effects in portuguese public spending

Journal article published in 2013 by Paulo Reis Mourão ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Pork-barrel effects are discussed using a specific program of Portuguese investment expenditures (PIDDAC) that has been observed since 1997. Our framework adds new insight to this important branch of Economics literature. First, our analysis is the first to be based on Sequential Dictators Games, which are more appropriate for studying the strategies of the agents involved in pork-barrel practices. Second, we examine the role of ‘irrelevance effects’, which limit or offset the pork-barrel effect even if the recipient municipality and the Portuguese Government are ruled by the same political wing. Our empirical estimations confirm that the Portuguese government tends to increase PIDDAC transfers to the municipalities that are being ruled by the same political wing. Municipalities with fewer residents or fewer parishes tend to suffer the most significant irrelevance effects. PIDDAC transfers to all municipalities were found to be more generous during election years.