Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Heart Association, Stroke, 4(52), p. 1265-1275, 2021

DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.120.031797

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Tandem Lesions in Anterior Circulation Stroke

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Tandem lesions in the anterior circulation account for up to 30% of all large vessel occlusion strokes. The optimal periprocedural approach in these lesions is still a matter of debate. Methods: Data from the German Stroke Registry—Endovascular Treatment between June 2015 and December 2019 were analyzed. The German Stroke Registry—Endovascular Treatment is an academic, independent, prospective, multicenter, observational registry study with 25 participating stroke centers from all over Germany enrolling consecutive mechanical thrombectomy patients. Tandem lesions were defined as a combination of a relevant extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) pathology (ipsilateral stenosis >70% or occlusion) and concomitant intracranial large vessel occlusion. Successful reperfusion was defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b-3. The modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 at 3 months indicated good outcome. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of different technical strategies in tandem lesions. Results: Out of 6635 patients, 874 (13.2%) presented with tandem lesions. Of these, 607 (69.5%) underwent acute treatment of the extracranial ICA. Acute treatment of the extracranial ICA lesion led to a higher probability of successful reperfusion (odds ratio, 40.63 [95% CI, 30.03–70.06]) compared with patients who did not undergo acute treatment of the extracranial ICA lesion and was associated with good clinical outcome (39.5% versus 29.3%, P <0.001) and a lower rate of mortality (17.1% versus 27.1%, P <0.001) at 3 months. Further significant predictors of successful reperfusion were age (odds ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.96–0.99]; P =0.035) and intravenous thrombolysis (odds ratio, 10.58 [95% CI, 10.04–20.4]; P =0.033). Intracranial-first approach (n=227) compared with extracranial-first approach (n=267) resulted in a shorter time to flow restoration (53.5 versus 72.0 minutes, P <0.001) and a higher nonsignificant probability of good outcome (45.8% versus 33.0%, P =0.24) without differences in periprocedural complications. Conclusions: In tandem lesions in the anterior circulation, acute treatment of the extracranial ICA lesion is associated with better clinical outcome and lower mortality. The intracranial-first approach might provide advantages.