Published in
American Society for Microbiology, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 5(59), 2021
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02596-20
Links
Tools
Comparison of 16 Serological SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassays in 16 Clinical Laboratories
Journal article published in 2021 by
Lene H. Harritshøj 
,
Mikkel Gybel-Brask ,
Shoaib Afzal,
Pia R. Kamstrup,
Charlotte S. Jørgensen,
Marianne Kragh Thomsen,
Linda Hilsted,
Lennart Friis-Hansen,
Pal B. Szecsi,
Lise Pedersen,
Lene Nielsen,
Cecilie B. Hansen,
Peter Garred,
Trine-Line Korsholm,
Susan Mikkelsen
and other authors.
,
Mikkel Gybel-Brask ,
Shoaib Afzal,
Pia R. Kamstrup,
Charlotte S. Jørgensen,
Marianne Kragh Thomsen,
Linda Hilsted,
Lennart Friis-Hansen,
Pal B. Szecsi,
Lise Pedersen,
Lene Nielsen,
Cecilie B. Hansen,
Peter Garred,
Trine-Line Korsholm,
Susan Mikkelsen
and other authors.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
Full text: Download
Data provided by 
Abstract
Serological assays for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are needed to support clinical diagnosis and epidemiological investigations. Recently, assays for large-scale detection of total antibodies (Ab), immunoglobulin G (IgG), and IgM against SARS-CoV-2 antigens have been developed, but there are limited data on the diagnostic accuracy of these assays.