Published in

Oxford University Press, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2(503), p. 1884-1896, 2021

DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab383

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The excess of cool supergiants from contemporary stellar evolution models defies the metallicity-independent Humphreys-Davidson limit

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Humphreys–Davidson (HD) limit empirically defines a region of high luminosities (log10(L/L⊙) ≳ 5.5) and low effective temperatures ($T_{\rm eff} \lesssim 20 \, {\rm kK}$) on the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram in which hardly any supergiant stars are observed. Attempts to explain this limit through instabilities arising in near- or super-Eddington winds have been largely unsuccessful. Using modern stellar evolution, we aim to re-examine the HD limit, investigating the impact of enhanced mixing on massive stars. We construct grids of stellar evolution models appropriate for the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) and Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), as well as for the Galaxy, spanning various initial rotation rates and convective overshooting parameters. Significantly enhanced mixing apparently steers stellar evolution tracks away from the region of the HD limit. To quantify the excess of overluminous stars in stellar evolution simulations, we generate synthetic populations of massive stars and make detailed comparisons with catalogues of cool ($T_\mathrm{eff} \le 12.5\, \mathrm{kK}$) and luminous (log10(L/L⊙) ≥ 4.7) stars in the SMC and LMC. We find that adjustments to the mixing parameters can lead to agreement between the observed and simulated red supergiant populations, but for hotter supergiants the simulations always overpredict the number of very luminous (log10(L/L⊙) ≥ 5.4) stars compared to observations. The excess of luminous supergiants decreases for enhanced mixing, possibly hinting at an important role mixing has in explaining the HD limit. Still, the HD limit remains unexplained for hotter supergiants.