Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Oxford University Press, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1(14), p. 51-68, 2021

DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsaa040

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Productivity divergence: state policy, corporate capture and labour power in the USA

Journal article published in 2021 by Mildred E. Warner ORCID, Yuanshuo Xu ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract What factors explain the divergence between returns to labour and overall productivity across US counties? We model the role of power at the subnational state level: Republican partisan control, corporate lobbying (measured by ALEC-sponsored bills) and labour power (unionisation). We find where state policy is captured by corporate interests, this undermines inclusive growth. Our hierarchical models use 2012 data for county areas in the continental USA and find labour returns are higher in states with more unionisation, but lower in states with Republican control and more corporate penetration of state legislatures. Labour and local government power have limited effect.