Published in

International Union of Crystallography, Acta Crystallographica Section B: Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials, 1(77), p. 41-53, 2021

DOI: 10.1107/s2052520620014936

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

HAR, TAAM and BODD refinements of model crystal structures using Cu Kα and Mo Kα X-ray diffraction data

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The Independent Atom Model (IAM) of electron density is used in routine X-ray data analysis. However, this model does not give a quantitative description of the electron-density distribution. A better model that allows for modelling of aspherical charge density deformations is introduced by the Hansen–Coppens variant of the multipole model of electron density. However, the application of this model requires crystals of excellent quality and high-resolution XRD data which are quite often difficult criteria to fulfil. Therefore, Mo Kα and Cu Kα data of three model compounds (tricyclic imide, xylitol and methyluracil) were refined using IAM and new methods which enabled the refinement and reconstruction of charge density based on the Cu Kα data. These methods were the Bond-Oriented Deformation Density (BODD) model, Hirshfeld Atom Refinement (HAR) and the Transferable Aspherical Atom Model (TAAM). The final results were compared to the model obtained from neutron diffraction experiments. Our results demonstrated not only that Cu Kα data may be refined using BODD, HAR and TAAM methods, but also revealed systematic errors arising from the use of Cu Kα data. These errors were a result of the limited information in the low-resolution data set that manifested as higher values for the anisotropic displacement parameters (ADPs) and smaller maxima and minima of the residual electron density for the Cu Kα data compared to the Mo Kα data. Notably, these systematic errors were much less significant than those found for the IAM. Therefore, the application of BODD, HAR and TAAM on Cu Kα data has a more significant influence on the final results of refinement than for the Mo Kα data.