Background:Biological treatment (BT) has changed perspectives of JIA patients. Increasing data from real life experience have been reported.Objectives:To compare drug survival, safety and efficacy of BT in patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA).Methods:A retrospective observational study was conducted on JIA patients followed in a referal hospital and who had received at least one BT between 1999 and 2019.Results:218 BT in 130 JIA patients were analyzed. 67.7% were women with a median age at diagnosis of 8 years old IQR (3-13) and a median age at the beginning of the BT of 15 years old IQR(7.8-21). 21.5% of the patients had uveitis during follow-up. BT were indicated due to: arthritis(73.9%), uveitis(10.1%), arthritis and uveitis(2.7%), systemic activity(8.3%) and macrophage activation syndrome (1,8%).There were 130 BT started in 1st line, 55 in 2nd line, 20 in 3rd line, 10 in 4th line and 3 in 5th line.The 1st line BT most frequently indicated was Etarnecept(ETN) up to 40%, followed by 30% Adalimumab(ADA) and 16,2% Infliximab(INF). The median duration of the 1st line was 51 months IQR (14-109,3). However, 53.8% of the 1st line BT were swiched: 28.3% due to adverse events, 25.7% due to 1° failure and 25.7% due to 2° failure. The BT that were discontinued were: INF (76.2%) and Anakinra (ANAK) (75%) due to adverse events and ETN (59.6%) due to 1° and 2° failure. 55 patients started a 2nd BT: 43.6% received ADA and 20% Tocilizumab (TCZ) with a median duration of 43 months IQR (12-90). 22 of 55 BT required a change: 75% of ETN and 59% of INF prescribed in 2nd line were discotinued. The causes were: 40% 1° failure, 28% 2° failure and 12% remission. In 1st line 87,6% of patients received TNF inhibitors, 74% mantained the target in 2nd line. In 3rd line TCZ was the most frequent BT. 71.5% of patients continue on BT. BT was withdrawn in 20 of 130 patients due to remission (40%), adverse events (30%), and pregnancy (10%).In the analysis by decades, 80 BT (36.7%) were started from 1999 to 2008 and 138 BT (63.3%) from 2009 to 2019. In the 1st decade ETN and INF were the most frequently prescribed and in the 2nd decade, ADA and TCZ (p <0.0001). The 1st BT in the 2nd decade were indicated sooner compared to the 1st decade (1st decade: mean 119.5months SD(109.2); 2nd decade: mean 53.9 months SD(99.7); p <0.0001). In 1st line BT, the BT prescribed in the 2nd decade had a shorter duration than those in the 1st decade (1st decade: mean 84.1 months SD(71.8); 2nd decade: mean 51.7 months SD(5); p <0.0001).In the survival analysis, TCZ and ADA were the BT with the highest survival (p=0.001). Of the 31 patients that started TCZ, 61.3% continue on TCZ, with a median duration of 46 months IQR(25-99) and 36/68(52,9%) still on ADA with a median duration of 61,5 months IQR(30.5-98).Conclusion:42.3% of patients required more than one BT. Since the onset of the BT there has been a change in prescription, probably related to the emerge of new targets and the evidence provided by clinical trials and guidelines. TCZ and ADA were the BT with the highest survival rate. On the other hand, INF and ANAK were the ones with the lowest survival rate. The most common causes of BT change in 1st line were adverse events in relation to INF and ANAK. In 2nd line there was a high rate of change in those patients who maintained TNFi, related to 1° failure.Disclosure of Interests:None declared