Published in

IOP Publishing, The Planetary Science Journal, 1(2), p. 5, 2021

DOI: 10.3847/psj/abcbf4

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Ganymede’s Surface Properties from Millimeter and Infrared Thermal Emission

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract We present thermal observations of Ganymede from the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) in 2016–2019 at a spatial resolution of 300–900 km (0.″1–0.″2 angular resolution) and frequencies of 97.5, 233, and 343.5 GHz (wavelengths of 3, 1.3, and 0.87 mm); the observations collectively covered all Ganymede longitudes. We determine the global thermophysical properties using a thermal model that considers subsurface emission and depth- and temperature-dependent thermophysical and dielectric properties, in combination with a retrieval algorithm. The data are sensitive to emission from the upper ∼0.5 m of the surface, and we find a millimeter emissivity of 0.75–0.78 and (sub)surface porosities of 10%–40%, corresponding to effective thermal inertias of 400–800 J m−2 K−1 s−1/2. Combined with past infrared results, as well as modeling presented here of a previously unpublished night-time infrared observation from Galileo’s photopolarimeter–radiometer instrument, the multiwavelength constraints are consistent with a compaction profile whereby the porosity drops from ∼85% at the surface to at depth over a compaction length scale of tens of centimeters. We present maps of temperature residuals from the best-fit global models, which indicate localized variations in thermal surface properties at some (but not all) dark terrains and at impact craters, which appear 5–8 K colder than the model. Equatorial regions are warmer than predicted by the model, in particular near the centers of the leading and trailing hemispheres, while the midlatitudes (∼30°–60°) are generally colder than predicted; these trends are suggestive of an exogenic origin.