Published in

Kidney360, p. 10.34067/KID.0006782020, 2021

DOI: 10.34067/kid.0006782020

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Patiromer and spironolactone in resistant hypertension and advanced CKD: analysis of the randomized AMBER trial

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Background: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists reduce mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and have become a standard of care in those with resistant hypertension (rHTN). Yet their use is limited among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), primarily due to hyperkalemia. Methods: AMBER was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study which reported that the use of the potassium-binding drug patiromer allowed a more persistent use of spironolactone in patients with CKD and rHTN. In this report, we compare the safety and efficacy of patiromer in advanced CKD as a prespecified analysis. Results: Of the 295 patients randomized, 66 fell into the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 25-<30 subgroup. In this subgroup, persistent use of spironolactone was seen in 19/34 (56%) in the placebo group and 27/32 (84%) in the patiromer group (absolute difference 29%, P=0.016). In the eGFR 30-45 subgroup, persistent use of spironolactone was seen in 79/114 (69%) in the placebo group and 99/115 (86%) in the patiromer group (absolute difference 17%, P=0.003). There was no significant interaction between eGFR subgroups (P=0.46). Systolic blood pressure (BP) reduction with spironolactone in the eGFR 25-<30 subgroup was 6-7 mmHg; in the eGFR 30-45 subgroup, it was 12-13 mmHg. There was no significant interaction between eGFR subgroups on BP reduction (P=0.79). Similar proportions of patients reported adverse events (59% in the eGFR 25-<30 subgroup; 53% in the eGFR 30-45 subgroup). Conclusion: Patiromer facilitates the use of spironolactone among patients with rHTN, and its efficacy and safety are comparable in those with eGFR 25-<30 and 30-45 mL/min/1.73m2.