Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Karger Publishers, Liver Cancer, 1(10), p. 25-37, 2021

DOI: 10.1159/000510909

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Laparoscopic Liver Resection versus Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Small Single Nodular Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of Treatment Outcomes

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Treatment outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (p-RFA) for small single hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) have not yet been fully compared. The aim of this study was to compare LLR and p-RFA as first-line treatment options in patients with single nodular HCCs ≤3 cm. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> From January 2014 to December 2016, a total of 566 patients with single nodular HCC ≤3 cm treated by either LLR (<i>n</i> = 251) or p-RFA (<i>n</i> = 315) were included. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cumulative incidence of local tumor progression (LTP) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using the log-rank test. Treatment outcome of 2 treatment modalities was compared in the subgroup of patients according to the tumor location. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There were no significant differences in overall survival between LLR and p-RFA (<i>p</i> = 0.160); however, 3-year RFS was demonstrated to be significantly higher after LLR (74.4%) than after p-RFA (66.0%) (<i>p</i> = 0.013), owing to its significantly lower cumulative incidence of LTP (2.1% at 3 years after LLR vs. 10.0% after p-RFA, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). The complication rate of p-RFA was significantly lower than that of LLR (5.1 vs. 10.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.026). LLR also provided significantly better local tumor control than p-RFA for subscapular tumors (3-year LTP rates: 1.9 vs. 8.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.012), perivascular tumors (3-year LTP rates: 0.0 vs. 17.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.007), and tumors located in anteroinfero-lateral liver portions (3-year LTP rates: 0.0 vs. 10.7%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in LTP rates between LLR and p-RFA for non-subcapsular and non-perivascular tumors (<i>p</i> = 0.482) and for tumors in postero-superior liver portions (<i>p</i> = 0.380). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> LLR can provide significantly better local tumor control than p-RFA for small single HCCs in subcapsular, perivascular, and anteroinferolateral liver portions and thus may be the preferred treatment option for these tumors.