Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Nature Research, npj Quantum Materials, 1(6), 2021

DOI: 10.1038/s41535-020-00303-4

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Multi-atom quasiparticle scattering interference for superconductor energy-gap symmetry determination

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractComplete theoretical understanding of the most complex superconductors requires a detailed knowledge of the symmetry of the superconducting energy-gap ${\mathrm{{\Delta}}}_{𝐤}^α$ Δ k α , for all momenta k on the Fermi surface of every band α. While there are a variety of techniques for determining $|{\mathrm{{\Delta}}}_{𝐤}^α |$ ∣ Δ k α ∣ , no general method existed to measure the signed values of ${\mathrm{{\Delta}}}_{𝐤}^α$ Δ k α . Recently, however, a technique based on phase-resolved visualization of superconducting quasiparticle interference (QPI) patterns, centered on a single non-magnetic impurity atom, was introduced. In principle, energy-resolved and phase-resolved Fourier analysis of these images identifies wavevectors connecting all k-space regions where ${\mathrm{{\Delta}}}_{𝐤}^α$ Δ k α has the same or opposite sign. But use of a single isolated impurity atom, from whose precise location the spatial phase of the scattering interference pattern must be measured, is technically difficult. Here we introduce a generalization of this approach for use with multiple impurity atoms, and demonstrate its validity by comparing the ${\mathrm{{\Delta}}}_{𝐤}^α$ Δ k α it generates to the ${\mathrm{{\Delta}}}_{𝐤}^α$ Δ k α determined from single-atom scattering in FeSe where s± energy-gap symmetry is established. Finally, to exemplify utility, we use the multi-atom technique on LiFeAs and find scattering interference between the hole-like and electron-like pockets as predicted for ${\mathrm{{\Delta}}}_{𝐤}^α$ Δ k α of opposite sign.