Published in

Karger Publishers, Cerebrovascular Diseases, 1(50), p. 94-99, 2020

DOI: 10.1159/000511935

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Association between Intraplaque Hemorrhage and Vascular Remodeling in Carotid Arteries: The Plaque at RISK (PARISK) Study

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Vascular remodeling is a compensatory enlargement of the vessel wall in response to atherosclerotic plaque growth. We aimed to investigate the association between intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), vascular remodeling, and luminal dimensions in recently symptomatic patients with mild to moderate carotid artery stenosis in which the differences in plaque size were taken into account. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> We assessed vessel dimensions on MRI of the symptomatic carotid artery in 164 patients from the Plaque At RISK study. This study included patients with recent ischemic neurological event and ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis &#x3c;70%. The cross section with the largest wall area (WA) in the internal carotid artery (ICA) was selected for analysis. On this cross section, the following parameters were determined: WA, total vessel area (TVA), and lumen area (LA). Vascular remodeling was quantified as the remodeling ratio (RR) and was calculated as TVA at this position divided by the TVA in an unaffected distal portion of the ipsilateral ICA. Adjustment for WA was performed to correct for plaque size. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Plaques with IPH had a larger WA (0.56 vs. 0.46 cm<sup>2</sup>; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001), a smaller LA (0.17 vs. 0.22 cm<sup>2</sup>; <i>p</i> = 0.03), and a higher RR (2.0 vs. 1.9; <i>p</i> = 0.03) than plaques without IPH. After adjustment for WA, plaques containing IPH had a smaller LA (<i>B</i> = −0.052, <i>p</i> = 0.01) than plaques without IPH, but the RR was not different. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> After correcting for plaque size, plaques containing IPH had a smaller LA than plaques without IPH. However, RR was not different.