Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

MDPI, Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(9), p. 3846, 2020

DOI: 10.3390/jcm9123846

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Clinical Implications and Gender Differences of KCNQ1 p.Gly168Arg Pathogenic Variant in Long QT Syndrome

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Background: Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is an inheritable arrhythmogenic disorder associated with life-threatening arrhythmic events (LAEs). In general, patients with LQTS2 (KCNH2) and LQTS3 (SCN5A) are considered to be a greater risk of LAEs than LQTS1 (KCNQ1) patients. Gender differences are also important. Series analyzing families with the same pathogenic variants may help in the progress of elaborating strong specific genotype-phenotype management strategies. In this manuscript, we describe the phenotype of seven unrelated families, carriers of the KCNQ1 G168R pathogenic variant. Methods: we identified all consecutive index cases referred for genetic testing with LQTS diagnosis carriers of KCNQ1 G168R variant. Genetic and clinical screening for all available relatives was performed. Results: we evaluated seven unrelated families, with a total 34 KCNQ1 G168R carriers (two obligated carriers died without available EKGs to evaluate the phenotype). All index cases but one were women and three of them presented with aborted sudden cardiac death (SCD) or syncope. The presence of sudden death in these families is notable, with a total of nine unexplained sudden deaths and four aborted SCD. Phenotype penetrance was 100% in women and 37.5% in men. Conclusions: KCNQ1 G168R is a pathogenic variant, with a high penetrance among women and mild penetrance among men. Risk for LAEs in this variant seems not negligible, especially among woman, and risk stratification should always be carefully evaluated.