Published in

Oxford University Press (OUP), European Heart Journal, Supplement_2(41), 2020

DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.1650

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Has the proportion of patients diagnosed with myocardial infarction that receives a 12 ECG in the prehospital setting in the UK changed over time?

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Background Two thirds of patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) arrive at hospital in the UK by ambulance, usually staffed by paramedics who routinely carry out 12 lead ECGs for patients with suspected heart attack. However, recent research found that prehospital ECGs were missing for 40% of these patients, with better survival prospects in those who had received one. Purpose We are investigating reasons for non-administration of 12 lead ECG for patients diagnosed with AMI, in order to develop an intervention to improve practice. Firstly we explored whether the proportion of patients with AMI that receive a prehospital ECG has changed over time. Methods Interrogation of national UK national heart attack register (MINAP) database, extraction of data related to patients brought by ambulance by year. Results The cohort of patients diagnosed with AMI and taken to hospital by ambulance ranged from 32410 in 2005 to 60265 in 2017; the proportion with a prehospital ECG increased steadily across this period, from 51% to 78%, an average increase of 1.9% per annum. Conclusions Evidence based guidelines supporting the use of 12 lead ECG by ambulance paramedics may have contributed to improvements in care. However, 1 in 5 patients brought to hospital by ambulance still does not receive an ECG prior to arrival, which we know compromises their survival prospects. In order to optimise care we need to establish whether non-administration is a question of misdiagnosis, patient refusal or lack of availability of trained crews/equipment. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): British Heart Foundation