Published in

BMJ Publishing Group, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 4(92), p. 377-383, 2020

DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-324422

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Anti-MOG antibody–associated disorders: differences in clinical profiles and prognosis in Japan and Germany

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

BackgroundNeurological disorders with IgG antibodies against myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) have been increasingly recognised as a new type of neuroinflammatory disorder.ObjectiveThe study aimed to identify regional and ethnic differences in clinical profiles of MOG-IgG–associated disorders between East Asian (Japanese) and Caucasian (German) patients.MethodsDemographic, clinical and therapeutic data from 68 MOG-IgG–positive adults were collected (Japanese, n=44; German, n=24).ResultsAge and sex were similar between cohorts, with optic neuritis occurring most frequently at onset (Japanese: 61%; German: 58%). However, Japanese patients had a lower annualised relapse rate (0.4 vs 0.8, p=0.019; no relapse, 64% vs 25%, p=0.002) and lower Expanded Disability Status Scale score at the last visit (1.0 vs 2.0; p=0.008), despite similar follow-up periods (mean, 73.9 months vs 73.4 months), than those of German patients, respectively. Cerebral syndromes were more common (27% vs 4%; p=0.021) and myelitis less common (21% vs 50%; p=0.012) in Japanese than in German patients, respectively. Japanese patients were more commonly treated with long-term corticosteroids (73%), whereas German patients were more commonly treated with rituximab or other immunosuppressants (63%).ConclusionsAmong patients with MOG-IgG, Japanese tended to have a monophasic milder disease, whereas the majority of German patients had a relapsing course and more frequent myelitis, findings compatible with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Although the attack-prevention treatment regimens were considerably different, genetic and environmental factors may be important to determine clinical phenotypes and disease activity.