Published in

Oxford University Press, Brain, 11(143), p. 3435-3448, 2020

DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaa270

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Differences in network controllability and regional gene expression underlie hallucinations in Parkinson’s disease

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Visual hallucinations are common in Parkinson’s disease and are associated with poorer prognosis. Imaging studies show white matter loss and functional connectivity changes with Parkinson’s visual hallucinations, but the biological factors underlying selective vulnerability of affected parts of the brain network are unknown. Recent models for Parkinson’s disease hallucinations suggest they arise due to a shift in the relative effects of different networks. Understanding how structural connectivity affects the interplay between networks will provide important mechanistic insights. To address this, we investigated the structural connectivity changes that accompany visual hallucinations in Parkinson’s disease and the organizational and gene expression characteristics of the preferentially affected areas of the network. We performed diffusion-weighted imaging in 100 patients with Parkinson’s disease (81 without hallucinations, 19 with visual hallucinations) and 34 healthy age-matched controls. We used network-based statistics to identify changes in structural connectivity in Parkinson’s disease patients with hallucinations and performed an analysis of controllability, an emerging technique that allows quantification of the influence a brain region has across the rest of the network. Using these techniques, we identified a subnetwork of reduced connectivity in Parkinson’s disease hallucinations. We then used the Allen Institute for Brain Sciences human transcriptome atlas to identify regional gene expression patterns associated with affected areas of the network. Within this network, Parkinson’s disease patients with hallucinations showed reduced controllability (less influence over other brain regions), than Parkinson’s disease patients without hallucinations and controls. This subnetwork appears to be critical for overall brain integration, as even in controls, nodes with high controllability were more likely to be within the subnetwork. Gene expression analysis of gene modules related to the affected subnetwork revealed that down-weighted genes were most significantly enriched in genes related to mRNA and chromosome metabolic processes (with enrichment in oligodendrocytes) and upweighted genes to protein localization (with enrichment in neuronal cells). Our findings provide insights into how hallucinations are generated, with breakdown of a key structural subnetwork that exerts control across distributed brain regions. Expression of genes related to mRNA metabolism and membrane localization may be implicated, providing potential therapeutic targets.