Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

CSIRO Publishing, Soil Research, 2(59), p. 119, 2021

DOI: 10.1071/sr20013

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Importance of sugarcane straw maintenance to prevent soil organic matter depletion in a Nitisol in the central-southern region of Brazil

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Sugarcane straw is a potential feedstock to increase bioenergy production. However, leaving straw on the soil surface is important to sustaining soil organic matter (SOM). We conducted a field experiment to evaluate the impacts of two years of straw removal on SOM in a sugarcane area – on an Eutric Nitisol in south-eastern Brazil – with low straw production (7 Mg ha–1). The experiment was a randomised complete block design (four blocks) with four rates of straw removal: (i) no removal, (ii) medium removal, (iii) high removal and (iv) total removal. We evaluated straw decomposition, soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) stock (0–30 cm), labile C, and microbial biomass C and N (0–10 cm). Increases in the straw removal rates reduced decomposition, with 30–42% of the initial straw amount remaining on the soil after one year (first year) and 33–38% remaining at the end of the second year. During the first year, no effect was found on soil C (8 kg m–2) and N (0.7 kg m–2) stocks; however, during the second year, total straw removal reduced soil C stock by 10% (0–30 cm) compared with no straw removal. Straw removal rates negatively affected the labile C (6–10% and 20–25%, first and second year respectively) and microbial C (correspondingly 10–15% and 21–27%). Microbial N was not altered in the first year, but decreased 26% due to straw maintenance (no removal) during the second year. Total straw removal decreased the C management index (CMI) by 15% (first year) compared with no straw removal. However, during the second year, all rates of straw removal decreased the CMI: by 15% for medium, 22% for high and 26% for total removal. Our findings indicate that any straw removal in areas with low straw production negatively affects SOM, initially through reduction in labile C pools. Although slight impacts on soil C and N stock were detected, reduction in straw-derived inputs stimulates microbial utilisation of soil C pools, and consequently reduces SOM over time.