Published in

Cambridge University Press, Public Health Nutrition, 10(24), p. 3087-3099, 2021

DOI: 10.1017/s1368980021001117

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2020

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3672483

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

School-Based Interventions for the Treatment of Childhood Obesity: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Cluster Randomised Controlled Trials

Journal article published in 2020 by Tarcisus Jian Hui Ho ORCID, Ling Jie Cheng ORCID, Ying Lau ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractObjective:Schools offer an ideal setting for childhood obesity interventions due to their access to children and adolescents. This review aimed to systematically review the impact of school-based intervention for the treatment of childhood obesity.Design:Eight databases were searched from inception till 30 May 2020. A revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations criteria were used to evaluate the risk of bias and overall evidence. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed on Stata software using the random effects model. Overall effect was evaluated using Hedges’ g, and heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q and I2.Setting:Cluster randomised controlled trials (cluster-RCT) delivered in school.Participants:Children and adolescents (6–18 years of age) with overweight and obesity.Results:Twelve cluster-RCT from seven countries with 1755 participants were included in the meta-analysis. School-based interventions for the treatment of childhood obesity reduced BMI and BMI z-scores with a medium effect (g = 0·52). Subgroup analyses showed greater effectiveness of brief school-based interventions and the interventions conducted in lower-middle to upper-middle economies. Meta-regression assessed the heterogeneity and the final model, with covariates of the type of economies and trial duration, accounted for 41·2 % of the variability. The overall quality of evidence was rated low because of the high risk of bias and inconsistency.Conclusions:School-based interventions are a possible approach to provide universal healthcare for the treatment of childhood obesity, and further well-designed cluster-RCT with longer follow-up are needed. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020160735).