Published in

American Association for Cancer Research, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 12(29), p. 2735-2739, 2020

DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0651

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Mendelian randomization analysis of n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid levels and pancreatic cancer risk

Journal article published in 2020 by Dalia H. Ghoneim, Jingjing Zhu, Wei Zheng, Jirong Long, Harvey J. Murff, Fei Ye, Veronica Wendy Setiawan, Lynne R. Wilkens, Nikhil K. Khankari, Philip Haycock ORCID, Samuel O. Antwi, Yaohua Yang, Alan A. Arslan ORCID, Laura E. Beane Freeman, Paige M. Bracci and other authors.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Background: Whether circulating polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) levels are associated with pancreatic cancer risk is uncertain. Mendelian randomization (MR) represents a study design using genetic instruments to better characterize the relationship between exposure and outcome. Methods: We utilized data from genome-wide association studies within the Pancreatic Cancer Cohort Consortium and Pancreatic Cancer Case–Control Consortium, involving approximately 9,269 cases and 12,530 controls of European descent, to evaluate associations between pancreatic cancer risk and genetically predicted plasma n-6 PUFA levels. Conventional MR analyses were performed using individual-level and summary-level data. Results: Using genetic instruments, we did not find evidence of associations between genetically predicted plasma n-6 PUFA levels and pancreatic cancer risk [estimates per one SD increase in each PUFA-specific weighted genetic score using summary statistics: linoleic acid odds ratio (OR) = 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.98–1.02; arachidonic acid OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.99–1.01; and dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.87–1.02]. The OR estimates remained virtually unchanged after adjustment for covariates, using individual-level data or summary statistics, or stratification by age and sex. Conclusions: Our results suggest that variations of genetically determined plasma n-6 PUFA levels are not associated with pancreatic cancer risk. Impact: These results suggest that modifying n-6 PUFA levels through food sources or supplementation may not influence risk of pancreatic cancer.