Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Springer Verlag, Current Treatment Options in Rheumatology, 4(6), p. 313-324, 2020

DOI: 10.1007/s40674-020-00161-y

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Is There a Role for Plasma Exchange in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis?

Journal article published in 2020 by Maria Prendecki ORCID, Stephen P. McAdoo, Charles D. Pusey
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of review This review summarises the evidence for the use of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitis. TPE is an extra-corporeal treatment which efficiently removes IgG and other pathogenic small molecules from the blood. There are several mechanistic reasons why this should be of benefit in AAV including the well-described pathogenicity of ANCA. Recent findings The recently published PEXIVAS trial is the largest study of TPE in AAV to date. It did not show a benefit for adjunctive TPE on a primary end point of ESRD or death. There was no difference in serious adverse events between those treated with TPE and those treated with immunosuppressive drugs alone. Conclusions Based on the results of PEXIVAS, most patients with AAV should not be treated with adjunctive TPE. However, there are subgroups of patients with AAV for whom TPE may still be of benefit, including those with double positivity for anti-GBM antibodies and ANCA.