Published in

Springer Verlag, Sozial- und Präventivmedizin/Social and Preventive Medicine, 3(48), p. 191-200

DOI: 10.1007/s00038-003-2055-1

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Body mass index, waist hip ratio, and waist circumference: which measure to classify obesity?

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of a representative population sample of adults in South Australia who have a body mass index (a measure of overall obesity) classified as normal or underweight, but who also have a waist circumference or waist hip ratio (measures of central obesity) that indicates obesity. METHODS: A representative population sample of adults aged 18 years and over living in the north west region of Adelaide (n = 2523) were recruited to the study. Clinical measures of height, weight, waist and hip circumference were obtained and used to determine body mass index, waist hip ratio and waist circumference. RESULTS: Among women with a normal body mass index, 19.0% had a high waist circumference ( 80 cm) and 8.5% had a high waist hip ratio (> 0.85). Among males with a normal body mass index, 3.4% had a high waist circumference ( 95 cm) and 0.1% had a high waist hip ratio (>1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Body mass index, waist hip ratio and waist circumference all have a role in the identification of those who are obese or overweight. ; Tiffany Gill, Catherine Chittleborough, Anne Taylor, Richard Ruffin, David Wilson and Patrick Phillips ; © Birkhäuser