Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and Immunopathology, 2(19), p. 129-140, 2020

DOI: 10.24287/1726-1708-2020-19-2-129-140

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The complex intensive therapy regimen as curative therapy in patients with primary-resistant and relapsed neuroblastoma: R.M. Gorbacheva Memorial Institute for Children Oncology, Hematology and Transplantation experience

This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.

Full text: Unavailable

Question mark in circle
Preprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Postprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Published version: policy unknown

Abstract

About 20% of initially high-risk patients with neuroblastoma (NB) develop primary resistant to chemotherapy and more than 50% of them subsequently have a relapse. There is currently no uniform approach to therapy in this group and long-term outcomes are dismal. The study was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee and the Scientific Council of the I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University. A total of 78 patients with a median age of 5 (1–20) years with primary resistant (n = 33) or (n = 45) relapsed NB receiving treatment in R.M. Gorbacheva Memorial Center were included in this study. In 20 cases the 2nd-line therapy including topotecan (n = 10) or irinotecan (n = 10) was used, 58 patients received combined chemo- and targeted therapy (RIST regimen: rapamycin, irinotecan, sirolimus, temozolomide). Nineteen patients with primary resistant disease (n = 4) or systemic relapse (n = 15) subsequently underwent an allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation from haploidentical donor (haplo-HSCT). In all cases fludarabin-based reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens were used. Ten patents received modified graft (immunomagnetic selection or depletion), in 9 unmodified graft with subsequent post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCM) was used. Also, 16 of 19 haplo-HSCT recipients had post-transplant therapy. The clinical effect was seen in 79% of patients. The median event-free survival (EFS) in 2nd-line therapy and RIST recipients was 2.5 (1–11) and 8 (1–76) months, accordingly. The complete of good partial response in 2nd-line therapy or RIST recipients was seen in 5% and 15%, 14% and 31% of cases accordingly. The therapy toxicity was comparable in both groups. The median EFS for haplo-HSCT recipients was 15 months with 2-year OS and EFS in this group bring 44% and 21% accordingly. Seven of 19 (37%) patients are currently alive and 4 (21%) of 19 maintain response. All long-term responders have history of posttransplant therapy. There was no statistically significant difference based on graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis used (graft modification or PTCM) or KIR compatibility. Combined chemo- and targeted therapy (RIST) is characterized by acceptable toxicity and effective even in some previously resistant cases. In 20% of responders a long-term effect may be achieved by subsequent haplo-HSCT and post-transplant therapy.