Published in

Oxford University Press, British Journal of Surgery, 5(86), p. 698-698, 1999

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.0698c.x

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Randomized double-blind study of dopexamine versus placebo in aortic surgery

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Background Mechanisms involved in the development of colonic ischaemia are not fully understood and there are conflicting reports regarding predisposing factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of dopexamine hydrochloride on the incidence of colonic ischaemia following aortic surgery and to correlate immunohistochemical markers of inflammatory activation in its pathogenesis. Methods Thirty patients, of mean age 65 (range 46–84) years, undergoing elective infrarenal aortic surgery were randomized to receive a perioperative infusion of either dopexamine 2 µg kg–1 min–1 (n = 12) or 0·9 per cent saline placebo (n = 18). All patients underwent colonoscopy and biopsy following induction of anaesthesia and at 1 week after operation. Sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin, and for mast cell tryptase (MCT), myeloperoxidase (MPO) and both the inducible (iNOS) and endothelial (eNOS) isoforms of nitric oxide synthase. Sections were analysed blindly and independently by two histopathologists. Patient and operative data were collected and stored separately. Results Colonic ischaemia was noted in nine patients based on microscopic findings. Endoscopy alone had a sensitivity of 56 per cent. There was a significantly lower incidence of colonic ischaemia in patients receiving dopexamine compared with placebo (P < 0·05). One death resulted from colonic infarction in the placebo group 11 days after operation. There was increased MPO and MCT expression in patients with histological evidence of ischaemia (P < 0·05); iNOS staining within the vascular (P = 0·001) and lamina propria (P < 0·05) components of the mucosa was also significantly greater. No association was found with eNOS. Conclusion Perioperative dopexamine infusion confers a degree of protection to colonic mucosa following aortic surgery, possibly through an anti-inflammatory effect.