Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

SAGE Publications, Perception, 1(33), p. 35-48, 2004

DOI: 10.1068/p5024

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Early computation of contour curvature and part structure: Evidence from holes

Journal article published in 2004 by Marco Bertamini ORCID, Fauzia Mosca
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

We used holes to study unilateral border ownership and in particular the information carried by the sign of the curvature along the contour (ie the difference between convex and concave regions). When people perceive a hole, its shape has a reversed curvature polarity (ie a changed sign of curvature) compared to the same region perceived as an object. Bertamini (2001 Perception30 1295–1310), and Bertamini and Croucher (2003 Cognition87 33–54) suggested and found evidence to support the hypothesis that, because convex regions are perceived as parts, positional information is more readily available for convex regions. Therefore a change is predicted when a given region is perceived as either a hole or a figure. We confirm that finding in this study, using holes defined by binocular disparity. We conclude that a change from figure to hole always reverses the encoding of curvature polarity. In turn, polarity obligatorily affects perceived part structure and the processing of position.