Published in

American Society of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 15_suppl(38), p. 9533-9533, 2020

DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.9533

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Effect of performance status on survival with pembrolizumab monotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

9533 Background: Pembrolizumab (P) is now widely used as standard of care (SOC) in advanced NSCLC. We sought to identify prognostic factors influencing survival with it in a real-world setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of with advanced NSCLC patients who initiated treatment with SOC P monotherapy at our center from 2/11/16 to 10/15/19 (data cutoff 1/15/20). Patient demographic, clinicopathologic, therapeutic and outcomes data were extracted. Survival time was defined from start of P. Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression were utilized. Results: Of 74 patients with median follow up of 83.9 weeks, 30 (40.5%) were alive at cutoff. Patient characteristics at start of therapy were: 36 (48.6%) female, median age 68.5 yr (range 33-87), 10 (13.5%) with symptomatic brain metastases; 54 (72.9%) treatment-naïve, 29 (39.2%) with ECOG performance status (PS) ≥2. Tumor characteristics were: 53 (71.6%) with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%, median PD-L1 TPS 75% (range 1-100), tumor mutational burden (TMB) tested in only 37 (50%) patients, median TMB 8 mut/mB (range 1-62). Any grade immune-related adverse events (irAE) occurred in 33 (44.6%) patients, while 16 (21.6%) received systemic steroids. Median survival was 43.3 wks (95% CI 29-104.1). Multivariable regression showed ECOG PS of ≥2 as the strongest risk factor for death (Table). We next evaluated differences in characteristics of patients who were alive vs dead within 12 wks of starting P, by which initial response assessments are completed in routine practice. ECOG PS was the only significantly different baseline variable, even after multivariable adjustment (p = 0.002). Conclusions: ECOG PS of ≥2 is a poor prognostic risk factor associated with P monotherapy in advanced NSCLC. Though comprising a clinically significant subset of patients in real-world, they were not included in landmark trials (KEYNOTE-024 & 042). Prospective evaluation is warranted. [Table: see text]