Abstract Background Forty children who underwent the antegrade continence enema (ACE) procedure for faecal soiling were studied to determine factors predictive of outcome. Methods There were four patient groups: (1) ambulant with spinal dysraphism (n = 13), (2) wheelchair bound with spinal dysraphism (n = 14), (3) ambulant with miscellaneous disorders (n = 11) and (4) wheelchair bound with miscellaneous disorders (n = 2). Effectiveness of the procedure was assessed using technical evaluation and quality-of-life improvement (QOLI) scores (0–5). Objective assessment included colonic transit time (CTT) and anorectal manometry. Median follow-up was 21 (range 5–37) months. Results Some 28 of 40 children achieved continence. The procedure was reversed in four of 40 children. Of the other 36 children with a functioning ACE stoma, all reported improvement in quality of life (mean QOLI score 3·5). There were no significant differences in technical evaluation score, QOLI score, CTT, manometry findings or continence between ambulant groups and the wheelchair-bound group with miscellaneous disorders. QOLI score, anorectal squeeze pressure and continence were significantly poorer in those who were wheelchair bound with spinal dysraphism. Absent squeeze pressure was associated with poor outcome. Conclusion Wheelchair-bound children with spinal neuropathy have a poorer outcome following the ACE procedure. Although ACE is an effective method of promoting faecal continence, it is essential to determine the aetiology of incontinence and sphincter function before operation.