Published in

Public Library of Science, PLoS ONE, 11(16), p. e0259949, 2021

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259949

Qeios, 2020

DOI: 10.32388/7idpz6

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Pilot randomised controlled trial of the Risk Acceptance Ladder (RAL) as a tool for targeting health communications

Journal article published in 2020 by Olga Perski ORCID, Claire Stevens ORCID, Robert West ORCID, Lion Shahab ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

BackgroundImproving adherence to self-protective behaviours is a public health priority. We aimed to assess the potential effectiveness and ease of use of an online version of the Risk Acceptance Ladder (RAL) in promoting help-seeking for cigarette smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, insufficient physical activity, or low fruit and vegetable consumption.Methods843 UK adults were recruited, of whom 602 engaged in at least one risky behaviour. Those with no immediate plans to change (n= 171) completed a behaviour specific RAL. Participants were randomised to one of two conditions; a short message congruent (on-target,n= 73) or incongruent (off-target,n= 98) with their RAL response. Performance of the RAL was assessed by participants’ ability to select an applicable RAL item and reported ease of use of the RAL. Effectiveness was assessed by whether or not participants clicked a link to receive information about changing their target behaviour.ResultsTwo thirds (68.9%, 95% CI = 61.8%-75.3%) of participants were able to select an applicable RAL item that corresponded to what they believed would need to change in order to alter their target behaviour, with 64.9% (95% CI = 57.5%-71.7%) reporting that it was easy to select one option. Compared with the off-target group, participants allocated to the on-target group had greater odds of clicking on the link to receive information (31.5% vs 19.4%; OR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.01–4.26).ConclusionThe Risk Acceptance Ladder may have utility as a tool for tailoring messages to prompt initial steps to engaging in self-protective behaviours.