Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Elsevier, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5(17), p. 903-910, 2020

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.02.006

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Influence of Sex Hormones on the Relationship Between Body Fat and Glycated Albumin Levels

Journal article published in 2020 by Yiting Xu, Xiaojing Ma, Yun Shen ORCID, Yufei Wang, Jian Zhou, Yuqian Bao
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Background Previous studies have reported that glycated albumin (GA) is affected by body fat distribution. Sex hormones are reported to play an important role in fat metabolism. Aim This study aimed to explore the influence of sex hormones on the relationship between body fat and GA in a community population. Methods We recruited 763 middle-aged and elderly subjects with normal glucose tolerance from communities. GA was determined using the enzyme method, and serum estradiol (E2), total testosterone, and sex hormone–binding globulin (SHBG) were detected using chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassays. Outcome There was a statistically significant association between SHBG and GA remained after adjusting for body fat in both men and women. Results The average serum GA levels were 13.40 ± 1.10% in the 298 men and 465 postmenopausal women included in this study. GA presented a significant downward trend with increasing quartiles of total fat mass (FM), limb FM, and trunk FM in both men and women (all P for trend < .01). In men, total testosterone, free testosterone, and SHBG were positively correlated with GA (both P < .01), and the correlation between SHBG and GA remained after adjusting for body fat (P < .01). In women, E2, free testosterone, bioactive testosterone, and SHBG were correlated with GA (all P < .01); furthermore, the positive correlation between SHBG and GA and the inverse correlation between E2 and GA remained after adjusting for body fat (both P < .05). Multivariate linear regression analyses showed that in addition to trunk FM, SHBG was positively correlated with GA in both men and women (standardized β = 0.136, P = .035; standardized β = 0.101, P = .033); however, E2 was not independently correlated with GA in women. Clinical Implications SHBG may contribute to the influence of body fat, especially trunk fat on GA levels. Strengths & Implications This study used an automated bioelectrical impedance analyzer to measure segmental body composition including limb FM and trunk FM and further investigated the role of segmental body fat in the correlation between SHBG and GA. Sex hormones may explain in part why body fat content and distribution can alter GA levels. Conclusion SHBG is positively correlated with serum GA levels, and this correlation is independent of total or segmental body fat.