Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Optica, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4(37), p. A133, 2020

DOI: 10.1364/josaa.380088

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Suprathreshold contrast response in normal and anomalous trichromats

Journal article published in 2020 by Kenneth Knoblauch ORCID, Brennan Marsh-Armstrong, John S. Werner
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Maximum likelihood difference scaling was used to measure suprathreshold contrast response difference scales for low-frequency Gabor patterns, modulated along luminance and L–M color directions in normal, protanomalous, and deuteranomalous observers. Based on a signal-detection model, perceptual scale values, parameterized as d ′ , were estimated by maximum likelihood. The difference scales were well fit by a Michaelis–Menten model, permitting estimates of response and contrast gain parameters for each subject. Anomalous observers showed no significant differences in response or contrast gain from normal observers for luminance contrast. For chromatic modulation, however, anomalous observers displayed higher contrast and lower response gain compared to normal observers. These effects cannot be explained by simple pigment shift models, and they support a compensation mechanism to optimize the mapping of the input contrast range to the neural response range. A linear relation between response and contrast gain suggests a neural trade-off between them.