Published in

American Society of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 6_suppl(38), p. 438-438, 2020

DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.6_suppl.438

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Phase II randomized placebo-controlled neoadjuvant trial of nintedanib or placebo with gemcitabine and cisplatin in locally advanced muscle invasive bladder cancer (NEO-BLADE).

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

438 Background: Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy Improves overall survival in patients with MIBC. Nintedanib is an orally available, potent, small molecule, triple kinase inhibitor with the potential to further benefit patient prognosis. Methods: NEO-BLADE was designed as a randomised, placebo controlled phase II study (n=120) to compare the addition of nintedanib (N) (150mg/200mg BD) to a combination of Gemcitabine (G) and Cisplatin (C). The study was powered (80%, alpha=15% [one sided]) to detect an improvement in the histological complete response rate of 20% (OR = 2.37). Results: 120 patients were recruited from 15 sites between 04/Dec/2014 and 03/Sep/2018 (22% Female) with 109 patients evaluable. Complete response (CR) rates ( by ITT) were 22/57 (38.6%) and 25/63 (39.7%) for patients treated with/without N. Pathological CR on ITT was 21/57 (36.8%) and 20/63 (31.74%); For pathological evaluable patients it was 21/41 (51. 22% ) and 20/45 ( 44.44%) respectively. Patients treated with N showed a benefit in terms of PFS and OS with 12 month PFS rates of 89.0% and 74.1% in the Nintedanib and Placebo group respectively. P= 0.038 and HR (CI) 0.479 (0.236, 0.976). OS at 12/24 months N 96.26%/ 88.87% while in Placebo group 82.83%,/69.36%. P=0.022, HR (CI) 0.389 (0.168, 0.902). Toxicity was reported in terms of grade 3 adverse events [12/63 (19%) Placebo, 23/57 (40%) N] and Serious Adverse Events [35/63 (56%) Placebo, 34/57 (53%) N]. In terms of thromboembolic events, this was observed in 16/57 (28%) of patients treated with N and 13/63 (21%) without N (P=0.461). Conclusions: The study failed to reach its primary endpoint in demonstrating an improvement in pathological response rate between N and Placebo when given alongside G and C. The trial met its secondary end point in improvement of progression free survival and over all survival at 12 months and 24 months. Safety data from this placebo -controlled study confirms triplets can be given safely. There are efficacy signals with improvement in PFS and OS and the regimen warrants further investigation in randomised phase III trial. Translational studies to assess bio markers of response are planned. Clinical trial information: 11977.