Published in

Oxford University Press (OUP), Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 4(442), p. 3147-3154

DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1070

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Constraining the magnetic field in GRB relativistic collisionless shocks using radio data

Journal article published in 2013 by Rodolfo Barniol Duran ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Using GRB radio afterglow observations, we calculate the fraction of shocked plasma energy in the magnetic field in relativistic collisionless shocks ($ε_B$). We obtained $ε_B$ for 38 bursts by assuming that the radio afterglow light curve originates in the external forward shock and that its peak at a few to tens of days is due to the passage of the minimum (injection) frequency through the radio band. This allows for the determination of the peak synchrotron flux of the external forward shock, $f_p$, which is $f_p ∝ ε_B^{1/2}$. The obtained value of $ε_B$ is conservatively a minimum if the time of the "jet break" is unknown, since after the "jet break" $f_p$ is expected to decay with time faster than before it. Claims of "jet breaks" have been made for a subsample of 23 bursts, for which we can estimate a measurement of $ε_B$. Our results depend on the blast wave total energy, $E$, and the density of the circum-stellar medium (CSM), $n$, as $ε_B ∝ E^{-2}n^{-1}$. However, by assuming a CSM magnetic field ($∼ 10$ $μ$G), we can express the lower limits/measurements on $ε_B$ as a density-independent ratio, $B/B_{sc}$, of the magnetic field behind the shock to the CSM shock-compressed magnetic field. We find that the distribution on both the lower limit on and the measurement of $B/B_{sc}$ spans $∼ 3.5$ orders of magnitude and both have a median of $B/B_{sc} ∼ 30$. This suggests that some amplification, beyond simple shock-compression, is necessary to explain these radio afterglow observations. ; Comment: 9 pages, 2 tables, 2 figures; minor changes; MNRAS accepted