Published in

The Royal Society, Journal of the Royal Society. Interface, 161(16), p. 20190410, 2019

DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0410

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Behavioural analysis of single-cell aneural ciliate,Stentor roeseli,using machine learning approaches

Journal article published in 2019 by Mi Kieu Trinh ORCID, Matthew T. Wayland ORCID, Sudhakaran Prabakaran ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

There is still a significant gap between our understanding of neural circuits and the behaviours they compute—i.e. the computations performed by these neural networks (Carandini 2012Nat. Neurosci.15, 507–509. (doi:10.1038/nn.3043)). Cellular decision-making processes, learning, behaviour and memory formation—all that have been only associated with animals with neural systems—have also been observed in many unicellular aneural organisms, namelyPhysarum,ParameciumandStentor(Tang & Marshall2018Curr. Biol.28, R1180–R1184. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.09.015)). As these are fully functioning organisms, yet being unicellular, there is a much better chance to elucidate the detailed mechanisms underlying these learning processes in these organisms without the complications of highly interconnected neural circuits. An intriguing learning behaviour observed inStentor roeseli(Jennings 1902Am. J. Physiol. Legacy Content8, 23–60. (doi:10.1152/ajplegacy.1902.8.1.23)) when stimulated with carmine has left scientists puzzled for more than a century. So far, none of the existing learning paradigm can fully encapsulate this particular series of five characteristic avoidance reactions. Although we were able to observe all responses described in the literature and in a previous study (Dexteret al. 2019), they do not conform to any particular learning model. We then investigated whether models inferred from machine learning approaches, including decision tree, random forest and feed-forward artificial neural networks could infer and predict the behaviour ofS. roeseli. Our results showed that an artificial neural network with multiple ‘computational’ neurons is inefficient at modelling the single-celled ciliate's avoidance reactions. This has highlighted the complexity of behaviours in aneural organisms. Additionally, this report will also discuss the significance of elucidating molecular details underlying learning and decision-making processes in these unicellular organisms, which could offer valuable insights that are applicable to higher animals.