Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, RNA, 12(25), p. 1628-1645, 2019

DOI: 10.1261/rna.071779.119

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

A structure-based model for the prediction of protein–RNA binding affinity

Journal article published in 2019 by Chandran Nithin ORCID, Sunandan Mukherjee ORCID, Ranjit Prasad Bahadur ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Protein–RNA recognition is highly affinity-driven and regulates a wide array of cellular functions. In this study, we have curated a binding affinity data set of 40 protein–RNA complexes, for which at least one unbound partner is available in the docking benchmark. The data set covers a wide affinity range of eight orders of magnitude as well as four different structural classes. On average, we find the complexes with single-stranded RNA have the highest affinity, whereas the complexes with the duplex RNA have the lowest. Nevertheless, free energy gain upon binding is the highest for the complexes with ribosomal proteins and the lowest for the complexes with tRNA with an average of −5.7 cal/mol/Å2 in the entire data set. We train regression models to predict the binding affinity from the structural and physicochemical parameters of protein–RNA interfaces. The best fit model with the lowest maximum error is provided with three interface parameters: relative hydrophobicity, conformational change upon binding and relative hydration pattern. This model has been used for predicting the binding affinity on a test data set, generated using mutated structures of yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase, for which experimentally determined ΔG values of 40 mutations are available. The predicted ΔGempirical values highly correlate with the experimental observations. The data set provided in this study should be useful for further development of the binding affinity prediction methods. Moreover, the model developed in this study enhances our understanding on the structural basis of protein–RNA binding affinity and provides a platform to engineer protein–RNA interfaces with desired affinity.