Published in

November 2019, 13(11):2019, p. 1731-1739, 2019

DOI: 10.21475/ajcs.19.13.11.p1458

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Temporal progression of foliar plant diseases in corn hybrids

This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.

Full text: Unavailable

Question mark in circle
Preprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Postprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Published version: policy unknown

Abstract

The environment’s impact on foliar disease growth in annual crops and the various types of differentiation must be investigated to adapt effective disease control strategies. We studied the temporal progression of foliar disease complexes in 14 commercial corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids during the 2015/2016 crop season (Ipameri, Goiás, Brazil). The experiment consisted of 10 blocks and evaluated foliar disease severity using a diagrammatic scale. The evaluations occurred at 47, 53, 59, 74, 81 and 95 days after planting. At each time point, a plant was chosen randomly from each block (10 plants total), and the diseases causing foliar damage were identified. The areas under the disease progression curves (AUDPCs) and yields were calculated. Dependent variables were evaluated using a principal component analysis to study relationships between the hybrids and the disease severity on each leaf (biplot). Heatmaps were used to determine which leaves demonstrated the greatest disease severity and temporal disease progression, and an adjusted linear correlation model was used to predict yield relative to AUDPC. The foliar disease complex consisted of helmintosporiosis, common rust, macrospora leaf spot, cercosporiosis and maize white spot. The Ns90PRO© hybrid showed limited disease progression and; therefore, was considered more resistant and consequently had a lower AUDPC value. The Dow2B610PW© hybrid showed greater disease progression. Agroceres7098PRO2© had a greater yield and consequently a lower AUDPC value, while Lg6050PRO2© had a lower yield and a higher AUDPC value. In general, the more advanced the phenological stage, the more severe the leaf disease; however, disease progression (from plant base to plant tip) was genotype- dependent.