Published in

EDP Sciences, Astronomy & Astrophysics, (631), p. A67, 2019

DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936059

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Inversion of HIPPARCOS and Gaia photometric data for asteroids

Journal article published in 2019 by A. Cellino ORCID, D. Hestroffer, X.-P. Lu, K. Muinonen ORCID, P. Tanga
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Context.Sparse photometric data can be used to determine the spin properties and infer information about the shapes of asteroids. The algorithm adopted for the inversion ofGaiaphotometric data assumes, for the sake of simplicity and to minimize CPU execution time, that the objects have triaxial ellipsoid shapes. In the past, this algorithm was tested against large sets of simulated data and small numbers of sparse photometric measurements obtained by HIPPARCOS.Aims.After the secondGaiadata release, it is now possible to test the inversion algorithm against small samples of actualGaiadata for the first time. At the same time, we can attempt a new inversion of older HIPPARCOSmeasurements, using an updated version of the photometric inversion algorithm.Methods.The new version of our inversion algorithm includes the treatment of a Lommel-Seeliger scattering relation especially developed for the case of triaxial ellipsoid shapes. In addition, we also performed inversion attempts using a more refined shape model, based on the so-called cellinoid shapes.Results.With respect to the old inversion of HIPPARCOSdata carried out in the past, we obtain only marginal improvements. In the case ofGaiadata, however, we obtain very encouraging results. A successful determination of the rotation period is possible in most cases, in spite of the limited time span covered by data published in the secondGaiadata release (GDR2), which makes the determination of the spin axis direction still uncertain. Even a small number of measurements, less than 30 in many cases, are sufficient to obtain a satisfactory inversion solution. Using the more realistic cellinoid shape model, we find further improvement in the determination of the spin period.Conclusions.This is a relevant validation of GDR2 photometry of asteroids, and proof of the satisfactory performances of the adopted inversion algorithm.