Published in

Oxford University Press (OUP), European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, Supplement_1(21), 2020

DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jez319.430

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

P770 Does intraoperative transesophageal match postoperative echocardiography in mitral valve surgery?

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (iTEE) has an important role in mitral valve (MV) surgery, but may have dissimilar parameters from postoperative echocardiography (post-TTE). We aimed to evaluate iTTE Doppler flow profile and compare with the post-TTE in MV surgery. METHODS We conducted a prospective, observational study of 126 patients that underwent MVsurgery during 2 years. iTEE evaluated mean pressure gradient (MPG) and functional area. Patients were re-evaluated with TTE, 72 hours after surgery (post-TTE). iTEE and post-TTE Doppler values were compared and correlated. Preoperative TTE (pre-TTE) parameters were also determined. RESULTS The mean age was 59 ± 18 years and 55% were female. The prevalence of severe mitral regurgitation (MR) was 77.6% and severe mitral stenosis (MS) 23.7%. Globally, mitral valve repair was performed in 71%cases (83% for MR and 15% for MS) and replacement in 29% (64% for MR and 46% for MS). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) assessed in pre-TTE and post-TTE, as also MPG and functional area in post-TTE and iTEE are depicted on table 1. There was a higher numerical difference in iTEE vs post-TTE MPG values in mechanical valves (n = 5) (3.5 ± 1.2 to 5.2 ± 1.6, difference of 1.65 ± 2.4mmHg), than in biological valves (n = 17) (3.1 ± 1.1 to 3.9 ± 1.5, difference of 0.8 ± 1.7mmHg). Globally, iTEE-derived MPG and functional area were strongly correlated with their post-TTE values (r2 0.7 and 0.8,p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS iTEE Doppler parameters were strongly correlated with postoperative TTE parameters, with minimal differences: postoperative MPG were +0.4 ± 1mmHg higher in MV repair and +1.0 ± 1.8mmHg in MV replacement. There was a global improvement in sPAP. Our study demonstrates the usefulness of iTEE and its importance in stablishing possible reference values for postoperative follow-up. MR MS pre-TTE post-TTE P value pre-TTE post-TTE P value LVEF (± SD,%) 57 ± 9 52 ± 10 <0.001 58 ± 6 56 ± 7 <0.001 sPAP (± SD,mmHg) 42 ± 17 33 ± 9 <0.001 47 ± 18 35 ± 6 <0.001 TAPSE (± SD,mm) 18 ± 2 14 ± 3 <0.001 18 ± 2 14 ± 3 <0.001 MV repair MV replacement iTEE post-TTE P value iTEE post-TTE P value MPG (± SD, mmHg) 2.8 ± 1.5 3.1 ± 1.4 0.084 3.2 ± 1.4 4.2 ± 1.6 0.016 Functional Area (± SD, cm2) 2.8 ± 0.6 2.8 ± 0.7 0.665 2.8 ± 0.6 2.7 ± 0.8 0.653