Published in

Karger Publishers, Cerebrovascular Diseases, 3-6(48), p. 171-178, 2019

DOI: 10.1159/000504314

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Which Patients Require Physician-Led Inter-Hospital Transport in View of Endovascular Therapy?

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The current guidelines advocate the implementation of stroke networks to organize endovascular treatment (ET) for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) after transfer from a Primary Stroke Centre (PSC) to a Comprehensive Stroke Centre (CSC). In France and in many other countries around the world, these transfers are carried out by a physician-led mobile medical team. However, with the recent broadening of ET indications, their availability is becoming more and more critical. Here, we retrospectively analysed data of patients transferred from a PSC to a CSC for potential ET to identify predictive factors of major complications (MC) at departure and during transport that absolutely require the presence of a physician during interhospital transfer. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This observational, single-centre study included patients with evidence of intracranial LVO transferred for ET from Perpignan to a 156 km-distant CSC between January 1, 2015 and ­December 31, 2018. We compared 2 groups: MC group (patients who required emergency intervention by the medical team due to life-threatening complications, including need of mechanical ventilation at departure) and non-MC group (all other patients who experienced no or only minor complications that could be managed by the emergency paramedics alone). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among the 253 patients who were transferred to the CSC, 185 (73.1%) had no complication, 57 (22.6%) minor complications, and 11 (4.3%) had MC. In multivariate analysis, MC was associated with basilar artery (BA) occlusion (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001), initial National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score &#x3e;22 (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.005), and history of atrial fibrillation (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.04). Among the 168 patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), only 1 patient (0.6%) had MC due to an IVT-related adverse event during transfer. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Physician-led inter-hospital transports are warranted for patients with BA occlusion, initial NIHSS score &#x3e;22, or history of atrial fibrillation. For the other patients, transfer without a physician may be considered, even if treated with IVT.