Published in

American Society of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 6_suppl(38), p. 291-291, 2020

DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.6_suppl.291

Springer Nature [academic journals on nature.com], Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 3(23), p. 441-448, 2020

DOI: 10.1038/s41391-020-0202-x

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

GLUT1 expression in high-risk prostate cancer: correlation with 18F-FDG-PET/CT and clinical outcome

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

291 Background: Tumour FDG-uptake is of prognostic value in high-risk and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of this study is to investigate the underlying glucose metabolism mechanisms of 18F-FDG-uptake on PET/CT imaging in PCa. Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted for 94 patients diagnosed with a Gleason sum ≥8 at biopsy who underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging before radical prostatectomy. GLUT1, GLUT12 and HK2 expression were blindly scored after immunohistochemistry on radical prostatectomy specimens by 3 pathologists. 18F-FDG-uptake in primary lesion was measured by a blinded reader using maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). Correlations between GLUT1, GLUT12 and HK2 and SUVmax were assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation test. Survival probabilities were based on the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: With a median follow-up of 4.5 years, 56% (n=53) of patients had biochemical recurrence, 7% (n=7) progressed to castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) disease, 13% (n=12) developed metastasis and 6% (n=6) died. Correlation was found between GLUT1 expression and SUVmax level (r=0.2512, p=0.0182). In addition, SUVmax was significantly higher in tumours with high GLUT1 expression (n=17, 5.74±1.67) than tumours with low GLUT1 expression (n=71, 2.68±0.31, P=0.0037). Also, contrary to GLUT12 and HEX2 expression, a significant association was found between GLUT-1 expression levels and SUVmax index (p=0.004), lymph node status (p=0.046), volume of cancer (P=0.013), CRPC-free survival (p=0.02) and metastasis-free survival (p=0.04). Conclusions: GLUT1 expression in PCa tumours correlates with 18F-FDG-uptake and poor prognostic factors. These results suggest that this transporter is involved in the molecular mechanism of 18F-FDG-uptake in high-risk PCa and raise interest in targeting metabolic dependencies of PCa cells as a selective anticancer strategy.