Published in

American Physiological Society, American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 1(318), p. R57-R69, 2020

DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00177.2019

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Skin blood flow measurements during heat stress: technical and analytical considerations

Journal article published in 2020 by Georgia K. Chaseling ORCID, Craig G. Crandall ORCID, Daniel Gagnon ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

During heat stress, the skin vasculature can greatly increase conductance secondary to vasodilation. The subsequent increase in skin blood flow allows for convective heat transfer from the core to the skin and between the skin surface and the surrounding environment. Measurement of skin blood flow, therefore, provides valuable information regarding heat exchange between the body and the environment. In addition, assessment of skin blood flow can be used to study vascular control mechanisms. Most often, skin blood flow is measured by venous occlusion plethysmography, Doppler ultrasound, laser-Doppler flowmetry, and, more recently, optical coherence tomography. However, important delimitations to each of these methods, which may be dependent on the research question, must be considered when responses from these approaches are interpreted. In this brief review, we discuss these methods of skin blood flow measurement and highlight potential sources of error and limitations. We also provide recommendations to guide the interpretation of skin blood flow data.