Published in

National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 41(116), p. 20309-20314, 2019

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1907574116

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Factors driving the seasonal and hourly variability of sea-spray aerosol number in the North Atlantic

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Four North Atlantic Aerosol and Marine Ecosystems Study (NAAMES) field campaigns from winter 2015 through spring 2018 sampled an extensive set of oceanographic and atmospheric parameters during the annual phytoplankton bloom cycle. This unique dataset provides four seasons of open-ocean observations of wind speed, sea surface temperature (SST), seawater particle attenuation at 660 nm ( c p,660 , a measure of ocean particulate organic carbon), bacterial production rates, and sea-spray aerosol size distributions and number concentrations ( N SSA ). The NAAMES measurements show moderate to strong correlations (0.56 < R < 0.70) between N SSA and local wind speeds in the marine boundary layer on hourly timescales, but this relationship weakens in the campaign averages that represent each season, in part because of the reduction in range of wind speed by multiday averaging. N SSA correlates weakly with seawater c p,660 ( R = 0.36, P << 0.01), but the correlation with c p,660 , is improved ( R = 0.51, P < 0.05) for periods of low wind speeds. In addition, NAAMES measurements provide observational dependence of SSA mode diameter ( d m ) on SST, with d m increasing to larger sizes at higher SST ( R = 0.60, P << 0.01) on hourly timescales. These results imply that climate models using bimodal SSA parameterizations to wind speed rather than a single SSA mode that varies with SST may overestimate SSA number concentrations (hence cloud condensation nuclei) by a factor of 4 to 7 and may underestimate SSA scattering (hence direct radiative effects) by a factor of 2 to 5, in addition to overpredicting variability in SSA scattering from wind speed by a factor of 5.