Published in

American Society of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Oncology Practice, 2(15), p. e178-e186, 2019

DOI: 10.1200/jop.18.00528

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Decreasing Inappropriate Use of Rasburicase to Promote Cost-Effective Care

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rasburicase is a recommended treatment of tumor lysis syndrome and patients at high-risk for developing tumor lysis syndrome. Unfortunately, it is expensive, and unnecessary use raises costs of care. METHODS: Plan, Do, Study, Act methodology was used to decrease the inappropriate use of rasburicase. In the Plan phase, a multidisciplinary quality improvement team reviewed the rasburicase ordering process and its prescription patterns at Parkland Health and Hospital System between October 2015 and September 2017 to determine appropriate interventions for improvement. In the Do phase, interventions were deployed to improve rasburicase prescriptions. In the Study phase, the team reviewed the rasburicase orders and appropriateness from February 2018 to October 2018. During the Act phase, the interventions were found to be successful, and the process changes were solidified. RESULTS: At baseline, 65 doses of rasburicase were administered during the 2-year baseline period, 21 of these (32.3%) were inappropriate. Review of the ordering process identified pitfalls: one-click ready-to-sign order, fixed default dose, no hard-stop alert requiring physicians to review and confirm appropriate indications, and lack of secondary pharmacy review. We aimed to reduce the percentage of inappropriate rasburicase orders from a baseline of 32.3% to 10% over 3 months. In February 2018, we implemented the interventions, which resulted in reduction in inappropriate rasburicase use, with only a single inappropriate order placed in 7 months postintervention. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary approach and classic quality improvement methodology enabled us to reduce inappropriate rasburicase use. Straightforward electronic medical record interventions and secondary pharmacy review are effective in addressing overuse.