Published in

Oxford University Press, Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2019

DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofz485

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Virological outcome measures during analytical treatment interruptions in chronic HIV-1 infected patients

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
White circle
Published version: policy unclear
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Background Analytical treatment interruptions (ATI) are essential in research on HIV cure. However, the heterogeneity of virological outcome measures used in different trials hinders the interpretation of the efficacy of different strategies. Methods A retrospective analysis of viral load (VL) evolution in 334 ATI episodes in chronic HIV-1 infected patients collected from 11 prospective studies. Quantitative [baseline VL, set point, delta set point, VL and delta VL at given weeks after ATI, peak VL, delta peak VL, and area under the rebound curve], and temporal parameters [time to rebound (TtR), set point, peak, and certain absolute and relative VL thresholds] were described. Pairwise correlations between parameters were analyzed, and potential confounding factors (sex, age, time of known HIV infection, time on ART, and immunological interventions) were evaluated. Results Set point was lower than baseline VL (median delta set point -0.26. p< 0.001). This difference was >1 log10 copies/mL in 13.9% of the cases. Median TtR was 2 weeks; no patients had undetectable VL at week 12. Median time to set point was 8 weeks: by week 12, 97.4% of the patients had reached the set point. TtR and baseline VL were correlated with most temporal and quantitative parameters. The variables independently associated with TtR were baseline VL and the use of immunological interventions. Conclusions TtR could be an optimal surrogate marker of response in HIV cure strategies. Our results underline the importance of taking into account baseline VL and other confounding factors in the design and interpretation of these studies.