Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Oxford University Press, SLEEP, 10(42), 2019

DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsz151

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Identification of subgroups of chemotherapy patients with distinct sleep disturbance profiles and associated co-occurring symptoms

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractStudy ObjectivesPurposes of this study were to identify subgroups of patients with distinct sleep disturbance profiles and to evaluate for differences in demographic, clinical, and various sleep characteristics, as well for differences in the severity of co-occurring symptoms among these subgroups.MethodsOutpatients with breast, gynecological, gastrointestinal, or lung cancer (n = 1331) completed questionnaires six times over two chemotherapy cycles. Self-reported sleep disturbance was evaluated using the General Sleep Disturbance Scale (GSDS). Latent profile analysis was used to identify distinct subgroups.ResultsThree latent classes with distinct sleep disturbance profiles were identified (Low [25.5%], High [50.8%], Very High [24.0%]) across the six assessments. Approximately 75% of the patients had a mean total GSDS score that was above the clinically meaningful cutoff score of at least 43 across all six assessments. Compared to the Low class, patients in High and Very High classes were significantly younger, had a lower functional status, had higher levels of comorbidity, and were more likely to be female, more likely to have childcare responsibilities, less likely to be employed, and less likely to have gastrointestinal cancer. For all of the GSDS subscale and total scores, significant differences among the latent classes followed the expected pattern (Low < High < Very High). For trait and state anxiety, depressive symptoms, morning and evening fatigue, decrements in attentional function, and decrements in morning and evening energy, significant differences among the latent classes followed the expected pattern (Low < High < Very High).ConclusionsClinicians need to perform in-depth assessments of sleep disturbance and co-occurring symptoms to identify high-risk patients and recommend appropriate interventions.