Abstract OBJECTIVES We describe a conceptual approach involving the use of self-made xenopericardial grafts in combination with biological aortic valve prostheses and in addition using a xenopericardial tubes for aortic valve reimplantation in patients with infective prosthetic endocarditis after aortic root repair or supracoronary ascending aortic replacement. METHODS The cohort comprised 7 consecutive patients with proven prosthetic infection either after aortic root replacement (n = 5), the David operation (n = 1) or supracoronary ascending aortic replacement (n = 1). The strategy consists of complete removal of the infected prosthetic material and orthotopic reconstruction using a bovine pericardial patch sewn as a tube according to the required aortic diameter. RESULTS In case of valve replacement, Edwards Magna Ease (n = 4 patients) and Edwards Inspiris (n = 2 patients) were used inside the xenopericardial tube. Five patients also required hemiarch and 1 patient required complete aortic arch replacement. Median length of stay in the intensive care unit and on the regular ward thereafter was 11 (6.5–13.5) days and 26.0 (14.5–32.5) days, respectively. All patients were successfully discharged. Median follow-up time was 7.6 (±2.1) months. Currently, all patients are not on antibiotic therapy and free from any signs of persisting or recurring infection. At the short-term follow-up, no structural valve deterioration, paravalvular insufficiency or graft calcification was found. CONCLUSIONS Using a self-made xenopericardial graft in combination with a biological aortic valve prosthesis for a Bio-Bentall and using a xenopericardial tube for a Bio-David operation is a safe and reproducible strategy and presents an off-the-shelf alternative to homografts. The short-term results of this approach are excellent. Further studies are needed to confirm mid- and long-term durability in larger cohorts.