Published in

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Anesthesia & Analgesia, 1(107), p. 309-317, 2008

DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0b013e31816ba437

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Obstetric Anesthesia Digest, 2(29), p. 56-57, 2009

DOI: 10.1097/01.aoa.0000350589.98345.11

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Sex, Gender, and Pain: An Overview of a Complex Field

Journal article published in 2008 by Robert W. Hurley, Meredith C. B. Adams ORCID
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Traditionally, biomedical research in the field of pain has been conducted with male animals and subjects. Over the past 20–30 yr, it has been increasingly recognized that this narrow approach has missed an important variable: sex. An ever-increasing number of studies have established sex differences in response to pain and analgesics. These studies have demonstrated that the differences between the sexes appear to have a biological and psychological basis. We will provide brief review of the epidemiology, rodent, and human experimental findings. The controversies and widespread disagreement in the literature highlight the need for a progressive approach to the questions involving collaborative efforts between those trained in the basic and clinical biomedical sciences and those in the epidemiological and social sciences. In order for patients suffering from acute and/or chronic pain to benefit from this work, the approach has to involve the use or development of clinically relevant models of nociception or pain to answer the basic, but complex, question. The present state of the literature allows no translation of the work to our clinical decision-making.