Published in

Karger Publishers, Neuroendocrinology, 2(109), p. 165-170, 2019

DOI: 10.1159/000499606

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Is the Real Prevalence of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Underestimated? A Retrospective Study on a Large Series of Pancreatic Specimens

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

<b><i>Background/Aims:</i></b> The annual incidence of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET) has been estimated to be around 0.8/100,000 inhabitants. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of incidental histological diagnosis of PanNET in pancreatic specimen evaluation for a purpose other other than PanNET diagnosis. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> One thousand seventy-four histopathological examinations of pancreatic specimens performed in 3 centers in Italy were retrospectively reviewed. All cases with a main pathological diagnosis of PanNET were excluded. <b><i>Results:</i></b> An incidental associated diagnosis of PanNET was made in 41 specimens (4%). Among those 41 cases, 29 (71%) had a largest diameter &#x3c;5 mm (microadenoma), whereas the other 12 (29%) had a maximum size ≥5 mm (median diameter of the whole series = 3 mm, range 1–15). The association with a main diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) was significantly higher for patients who had an incidental PanNET (<i>p</i> = 0.048). There was no association between incidental diagnosis of PanNET and age, gender, BMI, smoking habit, diabetes, and type of operation. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The frequency of incidental histological diagnosis of PanNET is considerably high, suggesting that their real prevalence is probably underestimated. The present study suggests a possible correlation between the incidental occurrence of PanNET and IPMN.